Skip to main content

Mitigation measures across assessment types

How measures work in each assessment type and where to find them.

Written by Anna Tiril Uggerud

What and why

Voyager uses mitigation measures across all three assessment types, but they work differently in each one. This article gives a quick overview of where measures live and how they differ.

How it works

  • Climate risk assessment. When the risk evaluation determines that the risk level is too high, the system recommends adding measures. Measures are added separately from the assessment flow. You describe the measure, assign it to a team member, and track its status from planned to completed.

  • Environmental impact assessment. Measures are added as part of the assessment flow itself. You can add measures tied to specific high-risk categories, but also general measures the organization has already taken or plans to take, such as net positive contributions. The mitigation hierarchy applies: avoid first, then minimize, restore, and as a last resort, compensate.

  • Transition risk. Measures are part of transition plans and focus on improving a building's energy performance. You can create multiple plans per property to break improvements into manageable phases, each with estimated costs and expected impact.

Good to know

We are actively working on how measures are structured and managed across the platform. The current setup reflects the different regulatory requirements behind each assessment type, but the experience will evolve.

Regardless of assessment type, documenting measures is part of what makes assessments complete under the EU Taxonomy.

Did this answer your question?